Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Long Beach Unified School DistrictLong Beach Unified School District
VS
Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsCharlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Long Beach Unified School District

Long Beach Unified School District

1515 Hughes Way, Long Beach, 90810, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lbschools.net
723/1000Moderate

The Long Beach Unified School District has earned a reputation as one of America's finest school systems, winning many awards as a national and international model of excellence.

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:3,685
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

600 East Fourth Street, Fifth Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28202

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cmsk12.org/
783/1000Fair

The mission of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is to create an innovative, inclusive, student-centered environment that supports the development of independent learners. The vision of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is to lead the community in educational excellence, inspi...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:15,606
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Long Beach Unified School District

Long Beach Unified School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Long Beach Unified School District in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Long Beach Unified School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Long Beach Unified School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Long Beach Unified School District

Long Beach Unified School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
LON21304224
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA133120422

FAQ

Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Long Beach Unified School District or Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Long Beach Unified School District or Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Long Beach Unified School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2