Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lone Star Circle of CareLone Star Circle of Care
VS
Fresenius GroupFresenius Group
Lone Star Circle of Care

Lone Star Circle of Care

205 East University Avenue, Georgetown, 78626, US

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
690/1000Weak

Lone Star Circle of Care (LSCC) is a federally qualified community health center and a registered 501(c)3 Texas non‐profit organization operating health clinics throughout Texas. At LSCC we believe that offering comprehensive healthcare to patients in need helps to b...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:452
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Fresenius Group

Fresenius Group

Else-Kröner-Straße 1, Bad Homburg, 61352, DE

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fresenius.com
768/1000Fair

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2024,...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,612
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lone Star Circle of Care

Lone Star Circle of Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fresenius Group

Fresenius Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Lone Star Circle of Care has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lone Star Circle of Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lone Star Circle of Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fresenius Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lone Star Circle of Care

Lone Star Circle of Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LON1770746907
Fresenius Group

Fresenius Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FRE1770566194
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FRE2038291222

FAQ

Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care company and Fresenius Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care and Fresenius Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care and Fresenius Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lone Star Circle of Care or Fresenius Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lone Star Circle of Care or Fresenius Group ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care and Fresenius Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lone Star Circle of Care and Fresenius Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA