Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lone Peak Physical TherapyLone Peak Physical Therapy
VS
Purpose Brands, LLCPurpose Brands, LLC
Lone Peak Physical Therapy

Lone Peak Physical Therapy

PO Box 160010, Big Sky, Montana, 59716-0000, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lonepeakpt.com/
766/1000Fair

Human movement is our specialty. Whether you are an elite athlete, a "weekend warrior", or an injured worker, how efficiently you move dramatically affects how well you function. We know that the better you move, the better you will feel, and ultimately the better you...

NAICS:713
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:47
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Purpose Brands, LLC

Purpose Brands, LLC

111 Weir Drive, Woodbury, 55125, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://purposebrands.com/
743/1000Moderate

Purpose Brands, LLC provides fitness, nutrition and wellness support and services to more than 7,000 communities and millions of people around the world. We own and operate the world’s largest and most trusted portfolio of fitness, health and wellness franchise brand...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:29,223
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lone Peak Physical Therapy

Lone Peak Physical Therapy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Purpose Brands, LLC

Purpose Brands, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lone Peak Physical Therapy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Purpose Brands, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lone Peak Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lone Peak Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Purpose Brands, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Purpose Brands, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lone Peak Physical Therapy

Lone Peak Physical Therapy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Purpose Brands, LLC

Purpose Brands, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PUR3203232111425

FAQ

Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy company and Purpose Brands, LLC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy and Purpose Brands, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy and Purpose Brands, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lone Peak Physical Therapy or Purpose Brands, LLC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lone Peak Physical Therapy or Purpose Brands, LLC ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy and Purpose Brands, LLC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lone Peak Physical Therapy and Purpose Brands, LLC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA