Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RATP Dev Transit LondonRATP Dev Transit London
VS
Transnet Freight RailTransnet Freight Rail
RATP Dev Transit London

RATP Dev Transit London

74 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 1SY, GB

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

RATP Dev Transit London operates bus services in and around the capital on behalf of Transport for London. Private Hire and Commercial Services as well as Council route contracts complete the make up of our core business. Drawing on the knowledge of our historical pas...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:231
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transnet Freight Rail

Transnet Freight Rail

15 Girton Road. Parktown , Johannesburg , 2193, ZA

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Transnet Freight Rail is the largest division of Transnet SOC Ltd. It is a world class heavy haul freight rail company that specialises in the transportation of freight. The company maintains an extensive rail network across South Africa that connects with other rail n...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:10,927
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RATP Dev Transit London

RATP Dev Transit London

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transnet Freight Rail

Transnet Freight Rail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATP Dev Transit London in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet Freight Rail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RATP Dev Transit London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATP Dev Transit London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transnet Freight Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet Freight Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RATP Dev Transit London

RATP Dev Transit London

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transnet Freight Rail

Transnet Freight Rail

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London and Transnet Freight Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London and Transnet Freight Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RATP Dev Transit London or Transnet Freight Rail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RATP Dev Transit London or Transnet Freight Rail ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London and Transnet Freight Rail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RATP Dev Transit London and Transnet Freight Rail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8