Comparison Overview
London Stansted Airport

London Stansted Airport
Bassingbourn Road, Stansted Mountfitchet, CM24 1, GB
Last Update: 17/03/2026
London Stansted Airport is the 3rd largest in London (4th in UK) handling around 18 million passengers a year. Firmly positioned as a market leader for short-haul travel across Europe, with over 150 destinations across 30 countries, Stansted serves more scheduled con...

Emirates
Dubai, Dubai, 686, AE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Based in Dubai, the Emirates Group employs over 120,000 staff from more than 170 nationalities. The Emirates Group’s extensive and diverse international portfolio includes the world’s largest international airline, Emirates, and one of the largest combined air services ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

London Stansted Airport







Emirates






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for London Stansted Airport in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Emirates in 2026.
Incident History - London Stansted Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)
London Stansted Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Emirates (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emirates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

London Stansted Airport

Emirates
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A weakness has been identified in PHPGurukul Student Information System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /student_edit1.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
A vulnerability has been found in macrozheng mall up to 1.0.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /order/paySuccess of the component Payment Status Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument orderId leads to enforcement of behavioral workflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The vendor deleted the GitHub issue for this vulnerability without any explanation.
A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Sales and Inventory System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /pages/emp_del.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
A vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Sales and Inventory System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /pages/emp_edit.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
The Custom User Registration Fields for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in versions up to, and including, 2.2.3. This is due to the plugin accepting an attacker-controlled afreg_select_user_role value from the unauthenticated WooCommerce Store API /wc/store/v1/checkout request in the af_reg_checkout_data_to_order_meta_data_block() function, persisting it in order meta, and then passing it directly to WP_User::add_role() in the af_reg_custom_order_processing_function() function (hooked to woocommerce_thankyou) without validating against the plugin's admin-configured allowed role list. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate their privileges to Administrator by creating an account during checkout with a modified JSON body specifying administrator (or any other role slug) as the desired role. Note: The exploit requires the "User Role Selection" setting to be enabled.