Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

London North Eastern RailwayLondon North Eastern Railway
VS
Hitachi RailHitachi Rail
London North Eastern Railway

London North Eastern Railway

25 Skeldergate, York, England, GB

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.lner.co.uk
575/1000Very Poor

London North Eastern Railway is one of the UK’s leading long-distance train operators. Our services link London King’s Cross directly with many destinations in the East Midlands, Yorkshire, North East England and Scotland operating on a 936 mile route. We operate 155 s...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:1,113
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

60 Ludgate Hill, 7th Floor, One New Ludgate, London, England, GB, EC4M 7AW

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hitachirail.com
787/1000Fair

Hitachi Rail is committed to driving a sustainable mobility transition and helping every passenger, customer and community enjoy more connected, seamless and sustainable transport. Hitachi Rail is a trusted partner to operators around the world with expertise across eve...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:15,028
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
London North Eastern Railway

London North Eastern Railway

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London North Eastern Railway in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi Rail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - London North Eastern Railway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London North Eastern Railway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hitachi Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
London North Eastern Railway

London North Eastern Railway

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LON0893608111125
🔒 Incident : Breach
LON5292952101625
🔒 Incident : Breach
LON3852638100225
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HIT811071525

FAQ

Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between London North Eastern Railway company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between London North Eastern Railway and Hitachi Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between London North Eastern Railway and Hitachi Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - London North Eastern Railway or Hitachi Rail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - London North Eastern Railway or Hitachi Rail ?
Between London North Eastern Railway and Hitachi Rail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between London North Eastern Railway and Hitachi Rail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8