Comparison Overview

LOLC Holdings PLC

VS

Edward Jones

LOLC Holdings PLC

No. 100/1, Sri Jayewardenepura Mawatha, Rajagiriya,, 10100, LK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

A formidable global conglomerate, LOLC Holdings has strategically diversified into key economic growth sectors across financial services, leisure, agriculture and plantations, construction and real estate, manufacturing and trading, technology, research and innovation and strategic investments. The LOLC Group is on an accelerated growth trajectory and is inspired by the quest to nurture and shape the future of individuals and communities across the world. As a leading player in the International MSME sector, the LOLC Group has been a catalyst in facilitating, whilst striving to maximise environmental benefits through green financing, promoting financial independence for women and uplifting customers from poverty through financial inclusion in global markets. In keeping with its alignment to UN Sustainable Development Goals, LOLC is a catalyst of economic development as a responsible lender while maintaining strong client protection principles. Transforming communities in the South and South East Asian markets, the LOLC Group has made giant strides to entrench its footprint across Africa and Central Asia. The Group has already built its reputation as one of the largest multi-currency, multi-geography inclusive finance platform in the world, backed by advanced tech platforms designed by its fully-owned subsidiary companies which have now been successfully adopted across borders.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edward Jones

12555 Manchester Road, St. Louis, MO, 63131, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Edward Jones is a leading North American financial services firm in the U.S. and through its affiliate in Canada. The firm’s more than 20,000 financial advisors throughout North America serve more than 9 million clients with a total of $2.2 trillion in client assets under care as of December 31, 2024. Edward Jones' purpose is to partner for positive impact to improve the lives of its clients and colleagues, and together, better our communities and society. Through the dedication of the firm's approximately 54,000 associates and our branch presence in 68% of U.S. counties and most Canadian provinces and territories, the firm is committed to helping more people achieve financially what is most important to them. The Edward Jones website is at www.edwardjones.com, and its recruiting website is www.careers.edwardjones.com. Member SIPC.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 43,499
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lolc.jpeg
LOLC Holdings PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edward-jones.jpeg
Edward Jones
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LOLC Holdings PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edward Jones
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LOLC Holdings PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edward Jones in 2025.

Incident History — LOLC Holdings PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LOLC Holdings PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edward Jones (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edward Jones cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lolc.jpeg
LOLC Holdings PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edward-jones.jpeg
Edward Jones
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Data Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Edward Jones company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LOLC Holdings PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Edward Jones company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LOLC Holdings PLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Edward Jones company and LOLC Holdings PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edward Jones company nor LOLC Holdings PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Edward Jones company has disclosed at least one data breach, while LOLC Holdings PLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Edward Jones company nor LOLC Holdings PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC company nor Edward Jones company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Edward Jones company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LOLC Holdings PLC company.

Edward Jones company employs more people globally than LOLC Holdings PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC nor Edward Jones holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N