Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KGLohmann GmbH & Co. KG
VS
SolvaySolvay
Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Irlicherstr.55, Neuwied, 56567, DE

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.lohmann-tapes.com
693/1000Weak

Since 1851, the family-owned company Lohmann has pioneered adhesive tape technology. Headquartered in Neuwied, Germany, the company is part of the Lohmann Group, with annual sales of approximately 716 million euros, and employs more than 1,700 people across 27 branches ...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:605
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Solvay

Solvay

Rue de Ransbeek 310, Brussels, Belgium, BE, 1120

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.solvay.com
765/1000Fair

For over 160 years, Solvay has been a pioneer in science and innovation, mastering the essential chemistry that powers progress across generations. We are more than a chemical company — we are a catalyst for sustainable transformation, delivering vital solutions that sh...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:16,544
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Solvay

Solvay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG has 60.78% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solvay in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Solvay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solvay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOH1773765896
Solvay

Solvay

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG company and Solvay company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG and Solvay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG and Solvay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG or Solvay ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG or Solvay ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG and Solvay, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG and Solvay, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2