Comparison Overview
Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG
Irlicherstr.55, Neuwied, 56567, DE
Last Update: 17/03/2026
Since 1851, the family-owned company Lohmann has pioneered adhesive tape technology. Headquartered in Neuwied, Germany, the company is part of the Lohmann Group, with annual sales of approximately 716 million euros, and employs more than 1,700 people across 27 branches ...

Covestro
Friedrich-Ebert Straße 350, Leverkusen, 51373, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Covestro is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of high-quality polymer materials and their components. With its innovative products, processes and methods, the company helps enhance sustainability and the quality of life in many areas. Covestro supplies customers ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG







Covestro






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG has 60.78% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Covestro in 2026.
Incident History - Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Covestro (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Covestro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Covestro
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.