Comparison Overview
Logitech
Logitech
3930 N 1st St, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 20/08/2026
At Logitech, our purpose is to extend human potential in work and play. We do this by designing software-enabled hardware solutions that drive superior performance when gaming and superior productivity while at work, all with maximum comfort, speed and accuracy. We ena...
Samsung Electronics
129 Samsung-ro, Suwon-Si, 443-742, KR
Last Update: 11/08/2026
Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medica...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Logitech
Samsung Electronics
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Logitech has 41.18% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Samsung Electronics has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Logitech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Logitech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Samsung Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Logitech
Samsung Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was found in ggml-org llama.cpp bec4772f6. The impacted element is the function deserialize_tensor of the file ggml/src/ggml-rpc/ggml-rpc.cpp of the component ggml-RPC Server. Performing a manipulation of the argument op/op_params results in deserialization. The attack may be initiated remotely. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2026-34159 (GHSA-j8rj-fmpv-wcxw, PR #20908), which only added a buffer==nullptr rejection in create_node() and does not validate op or op_params. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.
A vulnerability has been found in CTFd up to 3.8.4. The affected element is the function _is_safe_url of the file CTFd/utils/validators/__init__.py. Such manipulation of the argument Next leads to open redirect. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 5d8515842fd1ab2c3a9f2dde9ffca907aa334ea9. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
- https://github.com/CTFd/CTFd/
- https://github.com/CTFd/CTFd/commit/5d8515842fd1ab2c3a9f2dde9ffca907aa334ea9
- https://github.com/CTFd/CTFd/pull/3026
- https://github.com/CTFd/CTFd/releases/tag/3.8.4
- https://mblunt.dev/writeups/ctfd-open-redirect/
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-78145
- https://vuldb.com/submit/882469
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/394533
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/394533/cti
A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /boarders.php of the component Boarder Management Module. Such manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file residents.php of the component Resident Search Functionality. This manipulation of the argument Search causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A vulnerability was found in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /archived_records.php of the component Restore/Delete. The manipulation of the argument resident_id results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.