Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LogitechLogitech
VS
HARMAN InternationalHARMAN International
Logitech

Logitech

3930 N 1st St, San Jose, California, US, 95134

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.logitech.com
590/1000Very Poor

At Logitech, our purpose is to extend human potential in work and play. We do this by designing software-enabled hardware solutions that drive superior performance when gaming and superior productivity while at work, all with maximum comfort, speed and accuracy. We ena...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:8,812
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

400 Atlantic St, Stamford, 06901, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com
796/1000Fair

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:28,758
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Logitech

Logitech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Logitech in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Logitech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Logitech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Logitech

Logitech

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LOG0802408111825
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOG3792937111725
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOG34102334112425
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Logitech company and HARMAN International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Logitech and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Logitech and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Logitech or HARMAN International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Logitech or HARMAN International ?
Between Logitech and HARMAN International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Logitech and HARMAN International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9