Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Armed Forces Logistics OrganisationArmed Forces Logistics Organisation
VS
US ArmyUS Army
Armed Forces Logistics Organisation

Armed Forces Logistics Organisation

Worblaufenstrasse 154, Bern, 3048, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

With around 3,000 employees and 12,000 members of the Logistics Brigade 1, the AFLO provides and maintains the equipment and infrastructure for training and deployment. The LBA also develops the logistics doctrine for the armed forces, manages the operational services o...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Army

US Army

1500 Army Navy Dr, Arlington, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.army.mil
816/1000Good

Welcome to the official U.S. Army LinkedIn page. The U.S. Army’s mission is to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders. If y...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:355,851
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Armed Forces Logistics Organisation

Armed Forces Logistics Organisation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Army

US Army

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Armed Forces Logistics Organisation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Army in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Armed Forces Logistics Organisation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Armed Forces Logistics Organisation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Armed Forces Logistics Organisation

Armed Forces Logistics Organisation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Army

US Army

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
USA201551122
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
USA11891122
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
USA185930422

FAQ

Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation company and US Army company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation and US Army, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation and US Army, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Armed Forces Logistics Organisation or US Army ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Armed Forces Logistics Organisation or US Army ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation and US Army, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Armed Forces Logistics Organisation and US Army, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96680
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in ByteDance Coze Scraper Extension up to 2.0.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function chrome.runtime.onMessageExternal.addListener of the file static/background/index.js of the component External Message Handler. The manipulation of the argument body.url/paginationConfig/xPathConfig/body.urls/xPaths results in missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-23
UPDATED
Date2026-09-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-96678
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in weiqingwen spring-boot-forum up to 538eecc3c6b85fdf0768ab4e8354b48c0c17d94f. Affected is the function validate of the file src/main/java/com/qingwenwei/util/NewUserFormValidator.java of the component Avatar Upload. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-23
UPDATED
Date2026-09-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-96676
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Fast FAC1900R 20190827_2.0.2. The impacted element is the function get_alias_name of the component uhttpd. Such manipulation leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-23
UPDATED
Date2026-09-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-96606
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in LB-Link BL-CPE600EU 5.8.13. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file Mifi_config.bin of the component Configuration Backup Handler. The manipulation results in information disclosure. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-23
UPDATED
Date2026-09-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70125
SUMMARY

Microsoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-23
UPDATED
Date2026-09-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8