Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Logistic DynamicsLogistic Dynamics
VS
Transport for NSWTransport for NSW
Logistic Dynamics

Logistic Dynamics

1140 Wehrle Dr, Buffalo, 14221, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://shipldi.com/
653/1000Weak

LDi Logistic Dynamics is a $500M freight brokerage focused on providing reliable, multi-modal transportation solutions across North America. We operate on a 1099 independent agent model, which means our customers work directly with seasoned, professional agents who run ...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:609
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Multiple locations , Multiple locations across the state, AU

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au
752/1000Fair

We’re an innovative NSW government organisation comprised of a network of agencies and divisions that keep the state moving. Our focus is on delivering safe, reliable and integrated transport networks for everyone. With over 28,000 team members, we’re committed to incl...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:18,452
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Logistic Dynamics

Logistic Dynamics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Logistic Dynamics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for NSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Logistic Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Logistic Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transport for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Logistic Dynamics

Logistic Dynamics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HOPLOG1765950962
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA303092125

FAQ

Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Logistic Dynamics company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Logistic Dynamics and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Logistic Dynamics and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Logistic Dynamics or Transport for NSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Logistic Dynamics or Transport for NSW ?
Between Logistic Dynamics and Transport for NSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Logistic Dynamics and Transport for NSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES