Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland OyMitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy
VS
CMA CGMCMA CGM
Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy

Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy

Vanha Porvoontie 229, 01380 VANTAA, undefined, undefined, FI

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Ergonomiset ja innovatiiviset trukit, palvelut ja ratkaisut tehostavat asiakkaidemme sisälogistiikan toimintoja ja vähentävät logistiikan kustannuksia. Olemme Mitsubishi Logisnext Europen (MLE) tytäryhtiö ja sen täysin omistama myyntiyhtiö. Päätoimipaikkamme sijaitsee ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:55
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CMA CGM

CMA CGM

4, Quai d'arenc, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, FR, 13002

Last Update: 18/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cma-cgm.com
774/1000Fair

The CMA CGM Group is a global player in sea, land, air and logistics solutions, true to its corporate Purpose, "We imagine better ways to serve a world in motion". Present in 177 countries, it employs 160,000 people, of which nearly 6,000 in Marseilles where its head o...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:32,784
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy

Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CMA CGM

CMA CGM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CMA CGM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CMA CGM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CMA CGM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy

Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CMA CGM

CMA CGM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CMA330092125
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CMA642092025
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CMA840092125

FAQ

Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy company and CMA CGM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy and CMA CGM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy and CMA CGM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy or CMA CGM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy or CMA CGM ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy and CMA CGM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks - Logisnext Finland Oy and CMA CGM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93740
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93739
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-75885
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93894
SUMMARY

In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:A/V:D/RE:L/U:Clear
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-93738
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1