Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

InPost ItalyInPost Italy
VS
ExpeditorsExpeditors
InPost Italy

InPost Italy

Via Roberto Lepetit 8/10 , 20124, Milan, 20124, IT

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.inpost.it
752/1000Fair

Nato nel 2009 con il primo Locker a Cracovia, InPost è oggi leader nelle soluzioni logistiche Out Of Home per l'e-commerce in Europa e conta oltre 88.000 punti di ritiro, tra Locker e InPost Point, in 9 Paesi europei. In Italia, InPost vanta una rete con più di 9.000 pu...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:180
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Expeditors

Expeditors

3545 Factoria Blvd SE, Bellevue, 98006, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.expeditors.com
764/1000Fair

Expeditors is a Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Seattle, Washington, USA. At Expeditors, we generate highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for our clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global netwo...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:18,738
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
InPost Italy

InPost Italy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Expeditors

Expeditors

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InPost Italy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Expeditors in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - InPost Italy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InPost Italy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Expeditors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Expeditors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
InPost Italy

InPost Italy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Expeditors

Expeditors

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
EXP916092125
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EXP22309322

FAQ

Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between InPost Italy company and Expeditors company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between InPost Italy and Expeditors, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between InPost Italy and Expeditors, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - InPost Italy or Expeditors ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - InPost Italy or Expeditors ?
Between InPost Italy and Expeditors, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between InPost Italy and Expeditors, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA