Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Loblaw Companies LimitedLoblaw Companies Limited
VS
lululemonlululemon
Loblaw Companies Limited

Loblaw Companies Limited

1 President's Choice Circle, Brampton, L6Y 5S5, CA

Last Update: 09/07/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.loblaw.ca/
586/1000Very Poor

Our Purpose – Live Life Well Loblaw Companies Limited is Canada’s food and pharmacy leader, the nation’s largest retailer, and the majority unit holder of Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. Loblaw – and its portfolio of grocery, health and beauty, financia...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:23,641
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2
lululemon

lululemon

1818 Cornwall Avenue, Vancouver, V6J1C7, CA

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
802/1000Good

If you are seeking a job opportunity with lululemon, please note that our recruiters will only contact candidates using an @lululemon.com email address. -- lululemon athletica inc. (NASDAQ:LULU) is a healthy lifestyle inspired athletic apparel company for yoga, running,...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:24,945
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Loblaw Companies Limited

Loblaw Companies Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
lululemon

lululemon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Loblaw Companies Limited has 63.04% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for lululemon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Loblaw Companies Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loblaw Companies Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - lululemon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

lululemon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Loblaw Companies Limited

Loblaw Companies Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOBTEL1776782580
🔒 Incident : Breach
NO-SHOPRELOB1773534483
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOB1773182157
lululemon

lululemon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited company and lululemon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited and lululemon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited and lululemon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Loblaw Companies Limited or lululemon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Loblaw Companies Limited or lululemon ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited and lululemon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Loblaw Companies Limited and lululemon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2