Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)
VS
PPDPPD
KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)

KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)

Celestijnenlaan 300, Heverlee, 3001, BE

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

The KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) division is part of the Department of Mechanical Engineering (Faculty of Engineering Science and Faculty of Engineering Technology) of the KU Leuven, Belgium. Some of the LMSD Principal Investigators actively contribut...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PPD

PPD

168 3rd Ave, Waltham, 02451, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ppd.com
792/1000Fair

The PPD™ clinical research business of Thermo Fisher Scientific, the world leader in serving science, enables customers to accelerate innovation and drug development through patient-centered strategies and data analytics. Our services, which span multiple therapeutic ar...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:22,499
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)

KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PPD

PPD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PPD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)

KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PPD

PPD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) company and PPD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) and PPD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) and PPD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) or PPD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) or PPD ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) and PPD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD) and PPD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2