Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand BusinessLMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business
VS
Liebherr GroupLiebherr Group
LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business

LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business

N/A

Last Update: 01/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lmipumps.com
742/1000Moderate

LMI is a leading brand of electronic and motor driven metering pumps and controllers. Our globally recognized yellow and black products serve municipal, industrial, and commercial water treatment applications as well as a wide variety of slurries and high viscosity che...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH, Biberach, 88400, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.liebherr.com
776/1000Fair

Established in 1949, the Liebherr Group today is not only one of the biggest construction equipment manufacturers in the world, but also offers high-quality, user-oriented products and services in many other areas. The family-run technology company employs nearly 50,000...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,864
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business

LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liebherr Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Liebherr Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liebherr Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business

LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business and Liebherr Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business and Liebherr Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business or Liebherr Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business or Liebherr Group ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business and Liebherr Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LMI Pumps, An Ingersoll Rand Business and Liebherr Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1