Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ASL at LanguageLine SolutionsASL at LanguageLine Solutions
VS
Propio Language ServicesPropio Language Services
ASL at LanguageLine Solutions

ASL at LanguageLine Solutions

N/A

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile

Organizations across the United States seek to form deeper relationships with the people they serve. As a LanguageLine ASL interpreter, you can help them expand into new markets, develop greater customer loyalty, and increase their impact. Apply today for our open onsit...

NAICS:54193
NAICS Definition:Translation and Interpretation Services
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

4950 College Blvd, Overland Park, Kansas, US, 66211

Last Update: 25/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.propio.com/
719/1000Moderate

Language Access, Driven by Innovation. We believe our technology-forward commitment allows us to offer a full suite of over-the-phone, video remote, in-person interpreting, translation and localization services. Our services provide Limited English Proficient speakers...

NAICS:54193
NAICS Definition:Translation and Interpretation Services
Employees:11,597
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ASL at LanguageLine Solutions

ASL at LanguageLine Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Translation and Localization Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASL at LanguageLine Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Translation and Localization Industry Avg (This Year)

Propio Language Services has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ASL at LanguageLine Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASL at LanguageLine Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Propio Language Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Propio Language Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ASL at LanguageLine Solutions

ASL at LanguageLine Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO1787632254

FAQ

Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions and Propio Language Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions and Propio Language Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ASL at LanguageLine Solutions or Propio Language Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ASL at LanguageLine Solutions or Propio Language Services ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions and Propio Language Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ASL at LanguageLine Solutions and Propio Language Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8