Comparison Overview
LiU Innovation och samverkan

LiU Innovation och samverkan
Olaus Magnus väg, Linköping, 583 30, SE
Last Update: 15/02/2026
LiU Innovation och samverkan verkar för att kunskapen från vårt universitet ska komma samhället till nytta. På samma sätt vill vi också att influenser och behov från det omgivande samhället påverkar vår verksamhet och utveckling. Samarbete med företag och organisationer...

Utrecht University
Heidelberglaan 6, Utrecht, Utrecht, 3512, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Utrecht University (UU), we are working towards a better world. We do this by researching complex issues beyond the borders of disciplines. We put thinkers in contact with doers, so new insights can be applied. We give students the space to develop themselves. In so ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LiU Innovation och samverkan







Utrecht University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LiU Innovation och samverkan in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Utrecht University in 2026.
Incident History - LiU Innovation och samverkan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LiU Innovation och samverkan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Utrecht University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Utrecht University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LiU Innovation och samverkan

Utrecht University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.