Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LiteLLMLiteLLM
VS
SnowflakeSnowflake
LiteLLM

LiteLLM

1730 Jones St, San Francisco, California, US, 94109

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.litellm.ai/
317/1000Critical

One governed platform for AI access, cost management, and guardrails across every model, agent, and MCP in your organization. LiteLLM is the foundation teams worldwide rely on to manage and scale their entire AI program. Backed by Y Combinator with 40k+ GitHub stars.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3
Snowflake

Snowflake

Menlo Park, CA, US, 94563

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.snowflake.com
100/1000Critical

Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed d...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,807
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
19
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LiteLLM

LiteLLM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Snowflake

Snowflake

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

LiteLLM has 834.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Snowflake has 560.38% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - LiteLLM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LiteLLM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LiteLLM

LiteLLM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1783694475
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1781000708
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1777472744
Snowflake

Snowflake

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1779855877
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCANOSNO1776126436
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANO1775660105

FAQ

Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LiteLLM company and Snowflake company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LiteLLM and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LiteLLM and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LiteLLM or Snowflake ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LiteLLM or Snowflake ?
Between LiteLLM and Snowflake, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LiteLLM and Snowflake, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59858
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0735, the C omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/ccomplete.vim interpolates the typeref: or typename: extension field of a tags entry, without escaping, into a :vimgrep pattern that is run through :execute. Because :vimgrep honors the bar as a command separator, a crafted tag field can close the search pattern and append an arbitrary Ex command; opening a hostile .c file whose project tags file contains such an entry and invoking C omni-completion runs that command as the editing user. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0735.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59857
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0725, the single-byte branch of spell_soundfold_sal() in src/spell.c translates a word through a spell file's SAL sound-folding rules into a caller-owned result buffer, but its result writes are guarded with reslen < MAXWLEN, allowing reslen to reach MAXWLEN before res[reslen] = NUL writes one byte past the end of the MAXWLEN-element stack buffer. A boundary-length word passed to soundfold(), or reached via sound-based spell suggestion while a SAL-based spell language is active under a non-multibyte 8-bit encoding, can corrupt the eval_soundfold() stack frame and crash the editor. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0725.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59856
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0736, the PHP omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/phpcomplete.vim interpolates a class or trait name, taken from the contents of the edited buffer, into a search() pattern that is run via win_execute() without escaping. A name containing a single quote can terminate the search() string argument early, and because the bar is honored as an Ex command separator, the remainder of the name is run as Ex commands; via the :! command this allows arbitrary operating-system command execution when a victim opens a crafted PHP file and invokes omni-completion. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0736.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59855
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, Asset.render in app/src/asset/index.ts interpolates the unsanitized this.path value into HTML assigned to innerHTML, allowing a crafted asset link containing a double quote to break out of the src attribute, inject an event handler, and execute JavaScript that can run OS commands in the Electron renderer. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59854
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2