Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LISI GROUPLISI GROUP
VS
BSH Home Appliances GroupBSH Home Appliances Group
LISI GROUP

LISI GROUP

6, Rue Juvenal Viellard, Grandvillars, 90600, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.lisi-group.com/
676/1000Weak

LISI is a global industrial group specializing in the manufacture of assembly solutions and high value-added components for the aerospace, automotive and medical sectors. A partner to the world's leading players and driven by its long-term family values, LISI innovates ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:138
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
BSH Home Appliances Group

BSH Home Appliances Group

Carl-Wery-Str. 34, Munich, 81739, DE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bsh-group.com
790/1000Fair

BSH Hausgeräte GmbH is one of the world’s leading home appliance manufacturers [1]. Our brand portfolio includes global appliance brands like Bosch, Siemens and Gaggenau, as well as the regional brands Neff and Thermador, each offering unique solutions tailored to meet ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:21,116
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LISI GROUP

LISI GROUP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BSH Home Appliances Group

BSH Home Appliances Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

LISI GROUP has 61.69% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BSH Home Appliances Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LISI GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LISI GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BSH Home Appliances Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BSH Home Appliances Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LISI GROUP

LISI GROUP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LIS1772469645
BSH Home Appliances Group

BSH Home Appliances Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LISI GROUP company and BSH Home Appliances Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LISI GROUP and BSH Home Appliances Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LISI GROUP and BSH Home Appliances Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LISI GROUP or BSH Home Appliances Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LISI GROUP or BSH Home Appliances Group ?
Between LISI GROUP and BSH Home Appliances Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LISI GROUP and BSH Home Appliances Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2