Comparison Overview
Liquid Reply
Liquid Reply
Luise-Ullrich Straße 14, Munich, 80636, DE
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Liquid Reply is a Reply Group Company specialized in developing Cloud Native platforms, Multicloud strategies and architectures. We focus on automating the infrastructure deployment, developing microservices and containerized solutions, enforcing security of cloud solut...
Indra
Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Liquid Reply
Indra
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Liquid Reply in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Indra has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Liquid Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Liquid Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Liquid Reply
Indra
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.