Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDDKernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD
VS
MetaMeta
Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD

Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD

International Tech Park Park Square,, Bangalore, 560066, IN

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
694/1000Weak

About Kernel Foundation - Kernel Bug Fixes & Open Source Contributions: We provide Linux kernel and device driver bug fix services to companies. Our engineers actively work on open source projects — triaging and fixing real issues listed on bugzilla across subsystems in...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
12
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Meta

Meta

1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, 94025, US

Last Update: 08/10/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.metacareers.com/
632/1000Poor

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, In...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:164,515
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD

Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Meta

Meta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD has 1042.86% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Meta has 890.1% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD

Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIN1789799026
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIN1786026478
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LINROCUBUDEB1786123420
Meta

Meta

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MET1791469897
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOMICTREMET1788168069
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
METAUS1790319227

FAQ

Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD company and Meta company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD and Meta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD and Meta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD or Meta ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD or Meta ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD and Meta, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD and Meta, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8