Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
LinkedIn

LinkedIn Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

linkedin.com

Founded in 2003, LinkedIn connects the world's professionals to make them more productive and successful. With more than 1 billion members worldwide, including executives from every Fortune 500 company, LinkedIn is the world's largest professional network. The company has a diversified business model with revenue coming from Talent Solutions, Marketing Solutions, Sales Solutions and Premium Subscriptions products. Headquartered in Silicon Valley, LinkedIn has offices across the globe.


LinkedIn A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

LinkedIn
Company Information
Website:https://careers.linkedin.com
Employees number:23,908
Number of followers:33,387,235
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:linkedin.com
LinkedIn Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
LinkedInSoftware Development
Updated:
07/06/2026
795/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
LinkedIn Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
LinkedInSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

LinkedIn
LinkedInFair
Current Score
795Baa (FAIR)
01000
8 incidents
-10.25 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
797Before Incident
Vulnerability
07 Jun 2026LinkedIn
LinkedIn: Cybersecurity vs Cyberattack | Cyber Security News ®

LinkedIn Cookie-Based Vulnerability Exploitation

795After Incident
CRITICAL-2
LIN1780863827
LinkedIn Confirms Cookie-Based Vulnerability Exploitation in Recent Security Incident LinkedIn recently disclosed a security incident involving the exploitation of a vulnerability tied to its cookie-based authentication system. The flaw, which could allow unauthorized access to user accounts, was leveraged by threat actors to bypass security measures and gain entry to sensitive data. The attack targeted both essential and non-essential cookies used by LinkedIn for service functionality, security, and personalized advertising. While the platform has not disclosed specific details on the number of affected users or the exact timeline, the incident underscores the risks associated with session management vulnerabilities in widely used authentication mechanisms. LinkedIn has since addressed the issue, reinforcing its security protocols and urging users to review their account activity. The company’s response highlights the ongoing challenges in balancing user experience, analytics, and robust cybersecurity defenses, particularly as attackers increasingly target authentication loopholes in high-profile platforms. The incident serves as a reminder of the persistent threats posed by cookie-based exploits in enterprise and social media environments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Authentication Bypass
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive user dataSystems Affected: LinkedIn authentication systemBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to security incidentIdentity Theft Risk: Potential risk of identity theft for affected users
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: User account data, sensitive informationSensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Potentially exposed
JUNE 2026
799Before Incident
Vulnerability
04 Jun 2026LinkedIn
Microsoft and LinkedIn: Cyber Security News ®’s Post

Microsoft 365 Android Apps Exposed Billions to Silent Account Takeover via 'FlagLeft' Vulnerability

797After Incident
CRITICAL-2
LINMIC1780539842
Microsoft 365 Android Apps Exposed Billions to Silent Account Takeover via "FlagLeft" Vulnerability A critical vulnerability in Microsoft’s Android apps dubbed FlagLeft exposed billions of users to silent account takeovers by granting unauthorized access to Microsoft account tokens. The flaw, discovered in production code, stemmed from a single overlooked debug flag (`setIsDebugMode(true)`) left active in six major Microsoft 365 apps, including LinkedIn. The issue allowed any third-party app on the same Android device to request and receive valid Microsoft account tokens without user interaction, login prompts, or notifications. No consent or additional permissions were required, making the attack undetectable to end users. The vulnerability affected a vast user base, as the impacted apps collectively serve billions of Android devices. Microsoft has since addressed the flaw, but the incident underscores the risks of overlooked debug configurations in production environments. The root cause a simple yet consequential oversight highlights the importance of rigorous code review in security-critical applications.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Account Takeover
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Microsoft account tokensSystems Affected: Six major Microsoft 365 Android apps, including LinkedInBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to silent account takeover riskIdentity Theft Risk: High (unauthorized access to Microsoft accounts)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Authentication tokens (Microsoft account tokens)Sensitivity Of Data: High (could lead to full account access)Personally Identifiable Information: Potentially (if tokens were used to access PII)
MAY 2026
798Before Incident
APRIL 2026
797Before Incident
MARCH 2026
825Before Incident
Breach
11 Mar 2026LinkedIn
LinkedIn: Join LinkedIn now — it’s free!

LinkedIn Data Scraping Incident Exposing User Information

796After Incident
CRITICAL-29
LIN1773246240
LinkedIn Faces Data Scraping Incident Exposing User Information A recent data scraping incident has exposed publicly available LinkedIn user profiles, raising concerns over privacy and unauthorized data collection. The breach, detected in early 2024, involved third-party actors extracting profile information including names, job titles, workplace details, and contact data from millions of accounts. The incident highlights the risks of large-scale data scraping, where automated tools harvest publicly accessible information without direct platform compromise. While LinkedIn’s systems were not breached, the extracted data could be used for phishing, social engineering, or targeted advertising. The company has acknowledged the activity but emphasized that no private or sensitive data (such as passwords or financial information) was accessed. This event follows similar scraping incidents in recent years, underscoring the challenges platforms face in balancing open access with user privacy. LinkedIn has implemented measures to detect and mitigate scraping attempts, though the long-term effectiveness of such protections remains under scrutiny. The exposed data’s potential misuse continues to pose risks for individuals and organizations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Scraping
MOTIVATION
PhishingSocial engineeringTargeted advertising
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Names, job titles, workplace details, contact dataBrand Reputation Impact: Raised concerns over privacy and unauthorized data collectionIdentity Theft Risk: Potential misuse for phishing or social engineering
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Publicly available profile informationNumber Of Records Exposed: MillionsSensitivity Of Data: Low (publicly accessible)Data Exfiltration: Extracted by third-party actorsNamesJob titlesWorkplace detailsContact data
FEBRUARY 2026
825Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
825Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
832Before Incident
Cyber Attack
29 Dec 2025LinkedIn
LinkedIn and AWS: FIN6 exploits HR workflows to breach corporate defenses

FIN6 Skeleton Spider Campaign Targeting HR Professionals via Fake Job Applications

824After Incident
LOW-8
LINAWS1766995316
FIN6 Exploits Cloud Infrastructure in Sophisticated HR-Targeted Phishing Campaign The financially motivated cybercrime group FIN6 (also known as Skeleton Spider) is leveraging fake job applications and trusted cloud services to target human resources (HR) professionals in a highly evasive social engineering campaign. Researchers at DomainTools uncovered the operation, which combines professional networking platforms like LinkedIn and Indeed with malware-hosted cloud infrastructure to bypass traditional security defenses. ### How the Attack Works 1. Initial Contact – Attackers pose as job seekers on professional platforms, engaging recruiters to build rapport before sending phishing emails with malicious links. 2. Fake Resume Sites – Domains mimicking real applicant names (e.g., bobbyweisman[.]com, ryanberardi[.]com) are registered via GoDaddy’s anonymous services and hosted on AWS EC2 or S3, blending into legitimate cloud traffic. 3. Sophisticated Evasion – The sites employ traffic filtering to distinguish targets from security researchers, checking IP reputation, geolocation, OS, and browser fingerprints. Only residential Windows users bypass CAPTCHA walls to receive malicious ZIP files containing the More_eggs backdoor. 4. Malware DeploymentMore_eggs, a modular JavaScript backdoor, operates in memory to evade detection, enabling credential theft, command execution, and follow-on attacks, including ransomware deployment. ### Why HR is a Prime Target HR teams frequently interact with external contacts and handle unsolicited communications, making them vulnerable to social engineering. The campaign exploits this trust, using realistic job lures to bypass email filters and endpoint security. FIN6’s shift from point-of-sale (POS) breaches to enterprise ransomware underscores its evolution toward higher-value targets. ### Cloud Abuse & Detection Challenges Attackers favor AWS and other cloud platforms due to: - Low-cost setup (free-tier abuse or compromised billing accounts). - Trusted IP ranges that evade enterprise network filters. - Scalability for hosting malicious infrastructure. The campaign highlights gaps in perimeter-based security, as traditional defenses struggle to detect threats embedded in legitimate cloud services. Security teams are advised to monitor for unusual traffic patterns and suspicious file types linked to cloud-hosted malware. ### AWS Response & Broader Implications An AWS spokesperson stated the company enforces terms prohibiting illegal use and acts swiftly on abuse reports. However, the incident raises questions about balancing cloud accessibility with security controls, particularly as threat actors increasingly exploit trusted infrastructure. FIN6’s operation demonstrates how low-complexity phishing, when paired with cloud evasion techniques, can outmaneuver even advanced detection tools—reinforcing the need for holistic security strategies that address both technical and human vulnerabilities.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing/Social Engineering, Malware Delivery
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, credential theft, follow-on attacks (e.g., ransomware deployment)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credentials, sensitive employee data, system accessSystems Affected: HR systems, corporate networksOperational Impact: Potential disruption of HR operations, follow-on attacks (e.g., ransomware)Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to compromised HR processesIdentity Theft Risk: High (credential theft, PII exposure)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Credentials, personally identifiable information (PII), sensitive employee dataSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, credentials, HR data)Data Exfiltration: Possible (More_eggs malware enables follow-on attacks)File Types Exposed: Malicious ZIP files containing JavaScript-based malware (More_eggs)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (credentials, HR data)
NOVEMBER 2025
833Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
833Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
832Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
832Before Incident
JULY 2025
832Before Incident
JUNE 2025
832Before Incident
Vulnerability
04 Jun 2025LinkedIn
VMware

Multiple Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerabilities in VMware NSX

830After Incident
MEDIUM-2
133614060625
Multiple Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the VMware NSX network virtualization platform could allow malicious actors to inject and execute harmful code. The security bulletin published on June 4, 2025, details three distinct vulnerabilities affecting VMware NSX Manager UI, gateway firewall, and router port components, with CVSS base scores ranging from 5.9 to 7.5. The vulnerabilities include a stored XSS flaw in NSX Manager UI, a stored XSS in gateway firewall response pages, and a stored XSS in router port configurations. VMware has released patches addressing all three vulnerabilities across affected product lines, emphasizing the need for immediate updates to mitigate the risk of privilege escalation and persistent XSS attacks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability
MOTIVATION
Privilege EscalationCredential TheftLateral Movement
IMPACT
VMware NSX Manager UIGateway FirewallRouter Port Configurations
DECEMBER 2016
801Before Incident
Breach
01 Dec 2016LinkedIn
LinkedIn

Lynda.com Security Breach

770After Incident
CRITICAL-31
LIN1136181123
Lynda.com now LinkedIn Learning, was informing its consumers of a security breach. The firm claims that an unauthorised third party gained access to a database that contained user data. The company began informing its clientele that hackers had gained access to learning data, including attempted courses and contact information. The company's owner, LinkedIn, verified the issue and disclosed that, as a precaution, the passwords of 55,000 users had been reset. It is possible that 9.5 million users were affected in total. LinkedIn disclosed further steps to safeguard user accounts on Lynda.com in reaction to the data leak.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Learning DataContact Information
DATA BREACH
Learning DataContact InformationPotentially 9.5 million users
JUNE 2016
829Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2016LinkedIn
LinkedIn

LinkedIn Data Breach

796After Incident
CRITICAL-33
LIN12220522
LinkedIn suffered a data breach incident in 2016 which exposed the email addresses and passwords of 117 million users. Hackers broke into the network, stole a database of password hashes, and posted some 6.5 million account credentials on a Russian password forum for the world to see. LinkedIn’s Chief Information Security Officer Cory Scott took the safety and security of members’ accounts seriously and offered protection tools such as email challenges and dual factor authentication.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Data Theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Email addresses and passwords
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Email addresses and passwordsNumber Of Records Exposed: 117 millionData Encryption: Password hashesPersonally Identifiable Information: Email addresses
JUNE 2012
839Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2012LinkedIn
LinkedIn Corporation

LinkedIn Data Breach (2016)

809After Incident
CRITICAL-30
LIN026090625
The California Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach affecting LinkedIn Corporation in June 2016, stemming from an earlier 2012 incident that was rediscovered. The breach exposed 117 million user accounts, compromising email addresses, hashed passwords, and LinkedIn member IDs. Although passwords were invalidated for accounts created before 2012 as a mitigating measure, the incident highlighted significant vulnerabilities in LinkedIn’s historical security practices. The exposed data, while hashed, posed risks of credential stuffing, phishing, and unauthorized account access if decryption attempts succeeded. The breach did not involve financial or highly sensitive personal data (e.g., Social Security numbers), but the scale of exposed credentials—one of the largest at the time—undermined user trust and required widespread password resets. LinkedIn faced reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny, though no direct financial fraud or identity theft was reported as a direct consequence of this specific breach.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
email addresseshashed passwordsLinkedIn member IDsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of 117 million accountsIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of email-password combinations)
DATA BREACH
email addresseshashed passwordsLinkedIn member IDsNumber Of Records Exposed: 117 millionSensitivity Of Data: Moderate to High (hashed passwords and email addresses)Data Exfiltration: YesData Encryption: Hashed (passwords)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (email addresses linked to member IDs)

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for LinkedIn ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on LinkedIn's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with LinkedIn ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view LinkedIn's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?