Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lindt & Sprüngli USALindt & Sprüngli USA
VS
Tata ElectronicsTata Electronics
Lindt & Sprüngli USA

Lindt & Sprüngli USA

One Fine Chocolate Place, Stratham, New Hampshire, undefined, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jobs.lindtusa.com
764/1000Fair

Headquartered in beautiful Stratham, New Hampshire, Lindt & Sprüngli USA is the fastest growing premium chocolate manufacturer in the US market. Just an hour north of Boston and only minutes to downtown Portsmouth, Lindt USA sits atop an 800,000 square-foot campus and h...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:734
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics

Bengaluru , IN

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.tataelectronics.com/
684/1000Weak

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenf...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:16,251
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lindt & Sprüngli USA

Lindt & Sprüngli USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindt & Sprüngli USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Tata Electronics has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lindt & Sprüngli USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindt & Sprüngli USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lindt & Sprüngli USA

Lindt & Sprüngli USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TATWHA1783182289
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
APP1782203449

FAQ

Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA company and Tata Electronics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA and Tata Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA and Tata Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lindt & Sprüngli USA or Tata Electronics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lindt & Sprüngli USA or Tata Electronics ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA and Tata Electronics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli USA and Tata Electronics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES