Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lindt & Sprüngli AustraliaLindt & Sprüngli Australia
VS
Vedanta GroupVedanta Group
Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile

When it comes to our team, Lindt & Sprüngli is proud to have a dedicated and passionate group of individuals who share a common love for crafting and sharing premium chocolate. Our people are the heart and soul of our organisation, and their expertise, creativity, and u...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:182
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

Vedanta Resources, London, GB

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

We operate on the belief that our people are our core assets and we consistently endeavour towards developing their potential to be our future leaders and key employees. We currently operate in India, South Africa, Liberia and Namibia, through our various subsidiaries. ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:18,513
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindt & Sprüngli Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Vedanta Group has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lindt & Sprüngli Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vedanta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vedanta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VEDJAI1776688765

FAQ

Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and Vedanta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and Vedanta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lindt & Sprüngli Australia or Vedanta Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lindt & Sprüngli Australia or Vedanta Group ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and Vedanta Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and Vedanta Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2