Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lindt & Sprüngli AustraliaLindt & Sprüngli Australia
VS
SC JohnsonSC Johnson
Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lindt.com.au/world-of-lindt/careers
761/1000Fair

When it comes to our team, Lindt & Sprüngli is proud to have a dedicated and passionate group of individuals who share a common love for crafting and sharing premium chocolate. Our people are the heart and soul of our organisation, and their expertise, creativity, and u...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:182
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SC Johnson

SC Johnson

1525 Howe Street, Racine, 53403, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.scjohnson.com
793/1000Fair

We’re SC Johnson, a family company at work for a better world™. We are a leading manufacturer of household cleaning products and products for home storage, air care, pest control, shoe care and professional products. SC Johnson’s high-quality products and iconic brands...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:13,517
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SC Johnson

SC Johnson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindt & Sprüngli Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SC Johnson in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lindt & Sprüngli Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SC Johnson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SC Johnson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Lindt & Sprüngli Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SC Johnson

SC Johnson

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia company and SC Johnson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and SC Johnson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and SC Johnson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lindt & Sprüngli Australia or SC Johnson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lindt & Sprüngli Australia or SC Johnson ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and SC Johnson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lindt & Sprüngli Australia and SC Johnson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES