Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lincoln FinancialLincoln Financial
VS
Fidelity InvestmentsFidelity Investments
Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial

150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, PA, US, 19087

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
501/1000Critical

Lincoln Financial (NYSE: LNC) helps people to confidently plan for their version of a successful future. We focus on identifying a clear path to financial security, with products including annuities, investments, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan ser...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:10,731
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
1
Fidelity Investments

Fidelity Investments

245 Summer St, Boston, MA, US, 02210

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.fidelity.com
585/1000Very Poor

Fidelity’s mission is to strengthen the financial well-being of our customers and deliver better outcomes for the clients and businesses we serve. Fidelity’s strength comes from the scale of our diversified, market-leading financial services businesses that serve indivi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:84,396
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fidelity Investments

Fidelity Investments

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Lincoln Financial has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Fidelity Investments has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lincoln Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fidelity Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LINLIN1780936450
🔒 Incident : Breach
LIN808072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
LIN016091825
Fidelity Investments

Fidelity Investments

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID1777315250
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITWELNAVUSAFID1771266975
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID013072825

FAQ

Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lincoln Financial company and Fidelity Investments company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lincoln Financial and Fidelity Investments, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lincoln Financial and Fidelity Investments, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lincoln Financial or Fidelity Investments ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lincoln Financial or Fidelity Investments ?
Between Lincoln Financial and Fidelity Investments, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lincoln Financial and Fidelity Investments, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA