Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lightspeed DMSLightspeed DMS
VS
Expedia GroupExpedia Group
Lightspeed DMS

Lightspeed DMS

215 N Admiral Byrd Rd, #150, Salt Lake City, Utah, US, 84116

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://lightspeedDMS.com
753/1000Fair

THE DEALERSHIP MANAGEMENT SOLUTION FOR HARD‑WORKING DEALERSHIPS For nearly 40 years, Lightspeed has collaborated with dealerships, creating industry-specific software solutions to streamline the way you work. We’re fanatics about the recreation industry, and we’re out t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:231
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Expedia Group

Expedia Group

1111 Expedia Group Way W., Seattle, 98119, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

At Expedia Group (NASDAQ: EXPE), we believe travel is a force for good – it opens minds, builds connections, and bridges divides. We create transformative tech that enables unforgettable experiences for all travelers, everywhere. Our trusted family of brands are known a...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:21,768
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lightspeed DMS

Lightspeed DMS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Expedia Group

Expedia Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lightspeed DMS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Expedia Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lightspeed DMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lightspeed DMS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Expedia Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Expedia Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lightspeed DMS

Lightspeed DMS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Expedia Group

Expedia Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lightspeed DMS company and Expedia Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lightspeed DMS and Expedia Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lightspeed DMS and Expedia Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lightspeed DMS or Expedia Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lightspeed DMS or Expedia Group ?
Between Lightspeed DMS and Expedia Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lightspeed DMS and Expedia Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA