Life-ft vs Globo - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Life@FT

Globo

Life@FT

N/A

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://aboutus.ft.com/careers

755/1000Fair

Welcome to Life at FT! This is your inside look at what it’s like to work at the Financial Times Group, a global business news organisation driven by purpose, powered by people, and fuelled by curiosity. On this page, we shine a light on the culture, values and everyd...

NAICS:51

NAICS Definition:Information

Employees:None

Subsidiaries:33

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Globo

Rua Lopes Quintas, 303, Rio de Janeiro, BR

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

https://vempraglobo.g.globo

811/1000Good

A globo é feita de gente que quer fazer diferente, fazer junto, fazer o futuro. Gente espalhada por todo o país (e mundo!) trabalhando com conteúdo, notícias, negócios, tecnologia e brasilidade de sobra. Canais na TV aberta e por assinatura, produtos digitais como gl...

NAICS:51

NAICS Definition:Information

Employees:26,301

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Life@FT

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Globo

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life@FT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Globo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Life@FT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life@FT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Globo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Globo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Life@FT

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Globo

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Life@FT company and Globo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Life@FT and Globo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Life@FT and Globo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Life@FT or Globo ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Life@FT or Globo ?

Between Life@FT and Globo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Life@FT and Globo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES