Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Liebherr Earthmoving EquipmentLiebherr Earthmoving Equipment
VS
SkanskaSkanska
Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment

Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.liebherr.com
749/1000Moderate

For the earthmoving sector Liebherr produces an extensive range of hydraulic excavators, hydraulic rope excavators, crawler tractors and loaders, wheel loaders, drilling rigs and dumper trucks. Imprint: https://www.liebherr.com/en/deu/disclaimer/imprint.html

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Skanska

Skanska

Warfvinges väg 25 (Group Headquarters), Stockholm, SE, SE-112 74

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skanska.com
782/1000Fair

Skanska Group uses knowledge & foresight to shape the way people live, work, and connect. More than 138 years in the making, we’re one of the world’s largest development and construction companies, with 2024 revenue totaling SEK 177 billion. We operate in select markets...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:23,492
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment

Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Skanska

Skanska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skanska in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Skanska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skanska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment

Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Skanska

Skanska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment company and Skanska company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment or Skanska ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment or Skanska ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment and Skanska, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Liebherr Earthmoving Equipment and Skanska, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9