Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Liebherr Tower CranesLiebherr Tower Cranes
VS
Bouygues ConstructionBouygues Construction
Liebherr Tower Cranes

Liebherr Tower Cranes

Memminger Straße 120, Biberach, undefined, 88400, DE

Last Update: 14/11/2025

View Profile

Liebherr’s crane programme is unsurpassed in terms of versatility. It comprises machines of all systems and size categories, with the ideal lifting technology for any civil engineering task. Imprint: https://www.liebherr.com/en/deu/disclaimer/imprint.html

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:469
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78 280, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Bouygues Construction employs 35,600 people around the world, all driven by the greatest and most exciting responsibility of all – building for life. For our customers in more than 50 countries, we deliver much more than projects. We build to create spaces, connectio...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:24,731
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Liebherr Tower Cranes

Liebherr Tower Cranes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liebherr Tower Cranes in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Liebherr Tower Cranes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liebherr Tower Cranes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Liebherr Tower Cranes

Liebherr Tower Cranes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Liebherr Tower Cranes or Bouygues Construction ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Liebherr Tower Cranes or Bouygues Construction ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Liebherr Tower Cranes and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA