Comparison Overview
Lidl Digital
Lidl Digital
Rötelstraße 38, Neckarsulm, 74172, DE
Last Update: 14/07/2026
For more than ten years Lidl Digital has worked on its digital business models as an e-commerce specialist & digital expert. This includes development & internationalization of our Onlineshop, the travel offers & other digital services such as photos or green power. Our...
John Lewis Partnership
Carlisle Place, London, SW1P 1BX, GB
Last Update: 11/09/2026
We’re the largest employee owned business in the UK and home of our cherished brands, John Lewis and Waitrose. We’re not just employees, we’re Partners, driven by our purpose to build a happier world. As we look to our future, there’s never been a more exciting time to ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Lidl Digital
John Lewis Partnership
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Lidl Digital has 48.72% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for John Lewis Partnership in 2026.
Incident History - Lidl Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lidl Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - John Lewis Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)
John Lewis Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Lidl Digital
John Lewis Partnership
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/commit/393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/pull/13995
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/releases/tag/2.4.0
- https://github.com/godzeo/vulhub/issues/2
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108770
- https://vuldb.com/submit/958017
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/416552
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/416552/cti
Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.
A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.