Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lidl NederlandLidl Nederland
VS
KrogerKroger
Lidl Nederland

Lidl Nederland

Warandebergstraat 20, Huizen, 1271 ZC, NL

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.lidl.nl
664/1000Weak

Als onderdeel van de Schwarz Group is Lidl een van de meest toonaangevende ondernemingen in de levensmiddelenbranche in Europa. De organisatie exploiteert momenteel meer dan 12.000 winkels en 200 distributie- en logistieke centra in 31 landen. In 1997 heeft Lidl haar ee...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:6,925
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Kroger

Kroger

1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, 45202, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thekrogerco.com
794/1000Fair

At Kroger, we believe no matter who you are or how you like to shop, everyone deserves affordable, easy-to-enjoy, fresh food. This idea is embodied in our simple tagline—Fresh for Everyone™. Kroger ranks as one of the world’s largest retailers. We are nearly half a m...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:144,442
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lidl Nederland

Lidl Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kroger

Kroger

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Lidl Nederland has 10.5% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kroger in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lidl Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lidl Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kroger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kroger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lidl Nederland

Lidl Nederland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LID1783975270
🔒 Incident : Breach
LID1783715540
Kroger

Kroger

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KRO81318422
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KRO505080525

FAQ

Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lidl Nederland company and Kroger company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lidl Nederland and Kroger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lidl Nederland and Kroger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lidl Nederland or Kroger ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lidl Nederland or Kroger ?
Between Lidl Nederland and Kroger, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lidl Nederland and Kroger, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3