Comparison Overview
Liberty Group South Africa
Liberty Group South Africa
1 Ameshoff Street,, Braamfontein, 2001, ZA
Last Update: 17/04/2026
At Liberty we believe that knowledge shared can change people's realities, every day. Since 1957 we’ve grown from being a South African life insurer to a Pan-African financial services company, offering asset management, investment and insurance solutions. We work wit...
Progressive Insurance
300 North Commons Blvd, Mayfield Village, 44143, US
Last Update: 09/09/2026
Every journey has a beginning, and wherever you are on your career path, we want to help you along the way. At Progressive, we exist to help people move forward and live fully. We strive to create a welcoming and flexible work environment for everyone, where employees ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Liberty Group South Africa
Progressive Insurance
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Liberty Group South Africa has 37.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Progressive Insurance in 2026.
Incident History - Liberty Group South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Liberty Group South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Progressive Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Progressive Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Liberty Group South Africa
Progressive Insurance
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.