Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WTW (formerly Liazon)WTW (formerly Liazon)
VS
HDFC ERGO General InsuranceHDFC ERGO General Insurance
WTW (formerly Liazon)

WTW (formerly Liazon)

199 Scott Street, Buffalo, New York, 14204, US

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wtwco.com
752/1000Fair

WTW (formerly Liazon) operates the industry-leading private benefits exchanges for businesses across the U.S. Distributed under the brand name Bright Choices® as well as several privately-labeled brands, Liazon exchanges are online benefits stores that allow employees t...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:208
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HDFC ERGO General Insurance

HDFC ERGO General Insurance

6th Floor, Leela Business Park, Andheri-Kurla Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai, Mumbai, 400059, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hdfcergo.com
778/1000Fair

HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited was promoted by erstwhile Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. (HDFC), India’s premier Housing Finance Institution and ERGO International AG, the primary insurance entity of Munich Re Group. Consequent to the implement...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:12,654
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WTW (formerly Liazon)

WTW (formerly Liazon)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HDFC ERGO General Insurance

HDFC ERGO General Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WTW (formerly Liazon) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HDFC ERGO General Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WTW (formerly Liazon) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WTW (formerly Liazon) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HDFC ERGO General Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HDFC ERGO General Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WTW (formerly Liazon)

WTW (formerly Liazon)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HDFC ERGO General Insurance

HDFC ERGO General Insurance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) and HDFC ERGO General Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) and HDFC ERGO General Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WTW (formerly Liazon) or HDFC ERGO General Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WTW (formerly Liazon) or HDFC ERGO General Insurance ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) and HDFC ERGO General Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WTW (formerly Liazon) and HDFC ERGO General Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59705
SUMMARY

mem0's openmemory/api component contains an unauthenticated access vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read, write, and delete arbitrary user memories by accessing API routers registered without authentication middleware. Attackers can supply arbitrary user_id parameters or directly access memory retrieval endpoints to expose private memory content, or invoke pause endpoints with global_pause=true to cause denial-of-service across all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59704
SUMMARY

Cap's GET /api/video/ai endpoint fails to validate user ownership or membership before returning private video AI metadata including titles, summaries, and chapters. Authenticated attackers can supply arbitrary video IDs to read sensitive AI-generated content and trigger unauthorized AI generation that consumes the video owner's credits without consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55078
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.17.0 and prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `POST /api/v2/files` converts zip uploads to tar in memory via `CreateTarFromZip`, which enforced a per-entry size limit but no aggregate limit on total decompressed output, writing to an unbounded in-memory buffer. Exploitation requires authenticated file-upload access and the impact is limited to availability (denial of service). The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 adds a metadata preflight check that sums projected entry sizes and a streaming writer that enforces the aggregate limit during decompression. As a workaround, restrict file-upload permissions to trusted users or place a reverse proxy with request-body size limits in front of `coderd`.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55077
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the `PUT /api/v2/users/{user}/password` endpoint authorized only `ActionUpdatePersonal` and did not prevent a `user-admin` from resetting an `owner` account's password. It also did not require the current password when an admin reset another user's password. Exploitation requires the privileged `user-admin` role so practical risk is limited to deployments that grant `user-admin` to less trusted operators. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 prevents non-owner users from resetting the password of an account that holds the `owner` role. As a workaround, restrict the `user-admin` role to trusted administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55076
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, Coder's OIDC callback checked `email_verified` with a direct Go `bool` type assertion. When an IdP returned the claim as a non-boolean (for example the string `"false"`) or omitted it, the assertion failed open and the email was treated as verified. Combined with an unconditional email-based account fallback, this enabled account takeover. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 coerces `email_verified` across bool, string and numeric types (fail-closed) and blocks the email fallback when the matched user already has a different linked IdP subject. As a workaround, ensure the IdP returns `email_verified` as a native JSON boolean. The email-fallback linking issue has no configuration workaround; upgrading is required.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2