Comparison Overview
Li Auto

Li Auto
Number 11 of Wenliang Street, Shunyi District, Beijing, Beijing, CN, 101399
Last Update: 24/05/2026
Founded on July. 1, 2015, Li Auto's brand mission is to "Be Proactive, Change the World". We are dedicated to providing families with safer, more comfortable, and more convenient smart EVs through breakthrough innovations in products, technologies, and business models. ...

Tenneco
15701 Technology Dr., Northville, Michigan, US, 48168
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re united by one purpose: to be the most trusted partner and the best manufacturer and distributor to the transportation industry. And we’re doing it by leaning into the one thing no one can copy: our culture — our sustainable competitive advantage. The Tenneco Way ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Li Auto







Tenneco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Li Auto in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tenneco in 2026.
Incident History - Li Auto (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Li Auto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tenneco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tenneco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Li Auto

Tenneco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.