Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
LG Uplus Business

LG Uplus Business Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

lguplus.com

.


LUB A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

LUB
Company Information
Website:http://www.lguplus.com
Employees number:9
Number of followers:174
NAICS:517
Industry Type:Telecommunications
Homepage:lguplus.com
LUB Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
logo
LUBTelecommunications
Updated:
10/03/2026
558/1000
Very Poor
Ca
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
LUB Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
LUBTelecommunications
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

LUB
LUBVery Poor
Current Score
558Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
1 incidents
-203 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
570Before Incident
MAY 2026
567Before Incident
APRIL 2026
564Before Incident
MARCH 2026
558Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
555Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
553Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
Breach
30 Dec 2025LUB
LG Uplus: KT faces action in South Korea after a femtocell security breach impacts users

KT Femtocell Security Breach Leading to Unauthorised Mobile Payments

549After Incident
LOW-203
LGU1767124813
KT Corp Faces Regulatory Action After Femtocell Security Breach Exposes Thousands in South Korea On December 30, 2025, South Korean authorities held KT Corp accountable for a major mobile payment breach stemming from critical security flaws in its femtocell infrastructure. Investigators found that KT used identical, long-term authentication certificates across its femtocells—valid for a decade—allowing unauthorized devices to repeatedly access the network without re-verification. The breach exposed identifiers of over 22,000 users, with 368 individuals falling victim to unauthorized transactions totaling 243 million won (≈$180,000 USD). Further scrutiny revealed that 94 KT servers were infected with over 100 types of malware, underscoring systemic security failures in the company’s femtocell management. Regulators concluded that KT neglected its obligation to provide secure telecommunications services, ordering the company to submit detailed prevention plans by June 2026 for compliance review. Authorities also urged mobile operators to rotate authentication server addresses regularly and block illegal network access to mitigate future risks. While some hacking techniques resembled a prior breach at SK Telecom, no direct link between the two incidents has been established. KT acknowledged the findings, pledging compensation for affected users and enhanced security measures rather than contesting the results. In a separate case, LG Uplus is under police referral after investigators discovered that compromised servers were discarded, preventing a full technical analysis. The South Korean government emphasized that robust cybersecurity is now a national priority, particularly as the country seeks to solidify its position as a global leader in AI and digital innovation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach, Unauthorised Transactions, Malware Infection
IMPACT
Financial Loss: 243 million won (unauthorised payments)Data Compromised: User identifiers, payment informationSystems Affected: Femtocells, 94 KT serversOperational Impact: Inadequate security management, regulatory scrutinyBrand Reputation Impact: Negative impact due to security failures and regulatory actionLegal Liabilities: Government action, potential fines, compensation obligationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (exposed user identifiers)Payment Information Risk: High (unauthorised transactions)
DATA BREACH
User identifiersPayment informationNumber Of Records Exposed: 22,000+Sensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, financial data)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
NOVEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
752Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
752Before Incident
JULY 2025
752Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for LUB ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on LUB's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with LUB ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view LUB's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?