Comparison Overview
LG Electronics Singapore

LG Electronics Singapore
Singapore, SG, Singapore, SG
Last Update: 13/04/2026
At LG, we deliver products and services that make lives better, easier and happier though increased functionality and fun. Put simply, we offer the latest innovations to make “Life Good” – from home appliances, consumer electronics and mobile communications to business...

Apple
1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, 95014, US
Last Update: 06/08/2026
We’re a diverse collective of thinkers and doers, continually reimagining what’s possible to help us all do what we love in new ways. And the same innovation that goes into our products also applies to our practices — strengthening our commitment to leave the world bett...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LG Electronics Singapore







Apple






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LG Electronics Singapore in 2026.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Apple has 2303.85% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - LG Electronics Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LG Electronics Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Apple (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Apple cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LG Electronics Singapore

Apple
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.