Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LG Electronics SingaporeLG Electronics Singapore
VS
AppleApple
LG Electronics Singapore

LG Electronics Singapore

Singapore, SG, Singapore, SG

Last Update: 13/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lg.com/sg
755/1000Fair

At LG, we deliver products and services that make lives better, easier and happier though increased functionality and fun. Put simply, we offer the latest innovations to make “Life Good” – from home appliances, consumer electronics and mobile communications to business...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Apple

Apple

1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, 95014, US

Last Update: 06/08/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.apple.com/careers
566/1000Very Poor

We’re a diverse collective of thinkers and doers, continually reimagining what’s possible to help us all do what we love in new ways. And the same innovation that goes into our products also applies to our practices — strengthening our commitment to leave the world bett...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:194,686
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
25
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LG Electronics Singapore

LG Electronics Singapore

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Apple

Apple

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Electronics Singapore in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Apple has 2303.85% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - LG Electronics Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Electronics Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Apple (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LG Electronics Singapore

LG Electronics Singapore

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Apple

Apple

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP1785997496
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
APPDISTREGOOTHE1785342399
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SPAAPP1785371243

FAQ

Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore company and Apple company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore and Apple, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore and Apple, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LG Electronics Singapore or Apple ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LG Electronics Singapore or Apple ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore and Apple, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LG Electronics Singapore and Apple, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3