Comparison Overview
Legacy Care

Legacy Care
2900 Sabre St, Virginia Beach, 23452, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Since 2016 Legacy Care has been an employee-owned company dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare outcomes. While Legacy Care is small, only 15 fulltime management and technical specialist employees, we deliver big company results. Our dedicated network of over...

Texas Health Resources
612 E Lamar Blvd, Arlington, US
Last Update: 10/07/2026
At Texas Health Resources, our mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. We are one of the largest faith-based, nonprofit health systems in the United States with a team of more than 28,000 employees of wholly owned/operated facilities...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Legacy Care







Texas Health Resources






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Legacy Care in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Texas Health Resources has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Legacy Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Legacy Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Texas Health Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Texas Health Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Legacy Care

Texas Health Resources
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.