Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)
VS
State of MissouriState of Missouri
Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)

Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)

Local Government House, Dublin 8, IE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lgma.ie
760/1000Fair

The Local Government Management Agency provides a range of professional services to the local government sector. We connect all 31 local authorities, aligning expertise and driving innovation. Simply put, we help local authorities to get things done.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
State of Missouri

State of Missouri

301 W High Street PO BOX 809, Jefferson City, Missouri, US, 65101

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mo.gov
757/1000Fair

Build the Missouri of tomorrow. Ensure a strong foundation today. Join a group of innovative team members focused on driving the State of Missouri forward. As public servants, our team members have the opportunity to produce work that is both lasting and important. Thi...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,114
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)

Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Missouri

State of Missouri

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Missouri in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Missouri (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Missouri cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)

Local Government Management Agency (LGMA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
State of Missouri

State of Missouri

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STA2502125100825

FAQ

Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) company and State of Missouri company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) and State of Missouri, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) and State of Missouri, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) or State of Missouri ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) or State of Missouri ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) and State of Missouri, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) and State of Missouri, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA