Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung NiedersachsenLGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen
VS
Larsen & ToubroLarsen & Toubro
LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen

LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen

Podbielskistraße 331, Hannover, 30659, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lgln.de
746/1000Moderate

Geoinformationen berühren inzwischen fast alle Lebensbereiche. Ob Verkehrslenkung, Hochwasserschutz oder die Suche nach einem Restaurant: Ohne Geodaten funktioniert nichts davon. Unser Landesamt sorgt dafür, dass für jedes Gebäude und jede Grenze, jede Fläche und jedes ...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:191
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

N.M.Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400001

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
807/1000Good

Larsen & Toubro is an Indian multinational engaged in EPC Projects, Hi-Tech Manufacturing and Services. It operates in over 50 countries worldwide. A strong, customer-focused approach and the constant quest for top-class quality have enabled L&T to attain and sustain ...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:135,733
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen

LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larsen & Toubro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Larsen & Toubro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larsen & Toubro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen

LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen or Larsen & Toubro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen or Larsen & Toubro ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2