Comparison Overview

LG Energy Solution

VS

Linde

LG Energy Solution

128 Yeoido Daero, Yeoung Dung Po Gu, None, Seoul, None, KR, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

LG Energy Solutions leads the future eco-friendly energy industry by developing distinguished materials and next-generation batteries. As the only chemical-based battery company in the world, we are leading the global lithium-ion battery market based on distinguished materials technology. We have become a global powerhouse in the EV and energy storage system (ESS) battery sector. And based on our unparalleled technologies, we are actively developing new products and procuring global battery production capacities to enhance our dominance in the next-generation energy market.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 6,550
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Linde

43 Church Street West, Woking, England, GU21 6HT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

Linde is a leading global industrial gases and engineering company with 2023 sales of $33 billion. We live our mission of making our world more productive every day by providing high-quality solutions, technologies and services which are making our customers more successful and helping to sustain, decarbonize and protect our planet. The company serves a variety of end markets including chemicals & energy, food & beverage, electronics, healthcare, manufacturing, metals and mining. Linde's industrial gases are used in countless applications, from life-saving oxygen for hospitals to high-purity & specialty gases for electronics manufacturing, hydrogen for clean fuels and much more. Linde also delivers state-of-the-art gas processing solutions to support customer expansion, efficiency improvements and emissions reductions. For more information about the company and its products and services, please visit www.linde.com. Visit our careers website www.lindecareers.com to take the next steps in your career with us. Legal Notice: https://www.linde.com/en/imprint Data Protection: https://dataprotection.linde.com/en/index.html

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 38,586
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lgenergysolution.jpeg
LG Energy Solution
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linde.jpeg
Linde
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LG Energy Solution
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Linde
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

LG Energy Solution has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Linde in 2025.

Incident History — LG Energy Solution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Energy Solution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Linde (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Linde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lgenergysolution.jpeg
LG Energy Solution
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linde.jpeg
Linde
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Linde company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LG Energy Solution company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LG Energy Solution company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Linde company has not reported any.

In the current year, LG Energy Solution company has reported more cyber incidents than Linde company.

LG Energy Solution company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Linde company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Linde company nor LG Energy Solution company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Linde company nor LG Energy Solution company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LG Energy Solution company nor Linde company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Linde company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LG Energy Solution company.

Linde company employs more people globally than LG Energy Solution company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LG Energy Solution nor Linde holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H