Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LG Energy SolutionLG Energy Solution
VS
GivaudanGivaudan
LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

128 Yeoido Daero, Yeoung Dung Po Gu, Seoul, KR

Last Update: 02/07/2026

View Profile
701/1000Moderate

LG Energy Solution leads the future eco-friendly energy industry by developing distinguished materials and next-generation batteries. As the only chemical-based battery company in the world, we are leading the global lithium-ion battery market based on distinguished mat...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:6,924
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Givaudan

Givaudan

Givaudan International SA, Vernier, 1214, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.givaudan.com
803/1000Good

Givaudan is a global leader in Fragrance & Beauty and Taste & Wellbeing. We celebrate the beauty of human experience by creating for happier, healthier lives with love for nature. Together with our customers we deliver food experiences, craft inspired fragrances, and de...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:14,643
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Givaudan

Givaudan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Energy Solution in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Givaudan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LG Energy Solution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Energy Solution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Givaudan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Givaudan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LGE4092240111925
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LGE5202152111925
Givaudan

Givaudan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LG Energy Solution company and Givaudan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LG Energy Solution and Givaudan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LG Energy Solution and Givaudan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LG Energy Solution or Givaudan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LG Energy Solution or Givaudan ?
Between LG Energy Solution and Givaudan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LG Energy Solution and Givaudan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9