Comparison Overview
LG Electronics Portugal
LG Electronics Portugal
Tagus Park, Porto Salvo, 2740-122, PT
Last Update: 03/12/2025
LG Electronics was founded in 1958 and ever since it has paved the way in the vanguard digital era, thanks to the technological know-how acquired while producing several appliances like radios and televisions. The company has introduced to the world new products, new te...
Samsung Electronics
129 Samsung-ro, Suwon-Si, 443-742, KR
Last Update: 13/10/2026
Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medica...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
LG Electronics Portugal
Samsung Electronics
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LG Electronics Portugal in 2026.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Samsung Electronics has 194.12% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - LG Electronics Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LG Electronics Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Samsung Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
LG Electronics Portugal
Samsung Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.