Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LG Electronics PortugalLG Electronics Portugal
VS
AppleApple
LG Electronics Portugal

LG Electronics Portugal

Tagus Park, Porto Salvo, 2740-122, PT

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lg.com/pt
753/1000Fair

LG Electronics was founded in 1958 and ever since it has paved the way in the vanguard digital era, thanks to the technological know-how acquired while producing several appliances like radios and televisions. The company has introduced to the world new products, new te...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:83
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Apple

Apple

1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, 95014, US

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.apple.com/careers
619/1000Poor

We’re a diverse collective of thinkers and doers, continually reimagining what’s possible to help us all do what we love in new ways. And the same innovation that goes into our products also applies to our practices — strengthening our commitment to leave the world bett...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:173,021
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
16
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LG Electronics Portugal

LG Electronics Portugal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Apple

Apple

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Electronics Portugal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Apple has 1395.33% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - LG Electronics Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Electronics Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Apple (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LG Electronics Portugal

LG Electronics Portugal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Apple

Apple

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP1781850324
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP1782116629
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GOOFOXAPP1778617574

FAQ

Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal company and Apple company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal and Apple, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal and Apple, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LG Electronics Portugal or Apple ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LG Electronics Portugal or Apple ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal and Apple, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LG Electronics Portugal and Apple, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8