Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LGC ASSURELGC ASSURE
VS
TÜV SÜDTÜV SÜD
LGC ASSURE

LGC ASSURE

undefined, London, undefined, undefined, GB

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lgcassure.com/
758/1000Fair

LGC ASSURE offers a connected suite of solutions that intelligently analyse the safety, quality and authenticity of your goods and services, alongside evolving value drivers such as health, environmental, human welfare and ethical impact. It brings together four glob...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Westendstr. 199, Munich, Germany, DE, 80686

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tuvsud.com
796/1000Fair

TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,734
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LGC ASSURE

LGC ASSURE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LGC ASSURE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV SÜD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LGC ASSURE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LGC ASSURE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV SÜD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV SÜD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LGC ASSURE

LGC ASSURE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LGC ASSURE company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LGC ASSURE and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LGC ASSURE and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LGC ASSURE or TÜV SÜD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LGC ASSURE or TÜV SÜD ?
Between LGC ASSURE and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LGC ASSURE and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3