Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Group Business ServicesLufthansa Group Business Services
VS
AirAsiaAirAsia
Lufthansa Group Business Services

Lufthansa Group Business Services

Airportring 21, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, 60549, DE

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile

Lufthansa Group Business Services (LGBS) aims at providing best-in-class Finance, Revenue Accounting, Human Resources and Procurement services. The organization operates globally, with a parent company in Germany (LGBS GmbH), as well as regionally responsible centers in...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,287
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AirAsia

AirAsia

AirAsia Berhad, RedQ, Jalan Pekeliling 5, KLIA2, Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY, 64000

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.airasia.com
636/1000Poor

It all starts here. 23 years ago, a dream took flight - shaping and forever changing the travel industry in Asia. The idea was simple: Make flying affordable for everyone. We made that dream happen. We started an airline in 2001. Today, we’ve evolved to become somethi...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:14,245
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Group Business Services

Lufthansa Group Business Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AirAsia

AirAsia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group Business Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

AirAsia has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Group Business Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Group Business Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AirAsia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AirAsia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Group Business Services

Lufthansa Group Business Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AirAsia

AirAsia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MALAIR1772151934
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AIR1013221122

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services company and AirAsia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services and AirAsia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services and AirAsia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Group Business Services or AirAsia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Group Business Services or AirAsia ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services and AirAsia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Group Business Services and AirAsia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA