Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)
VS
ZTE CorporationZTE Corporation
LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)

LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)

32, Hangang-daero, Yongsan-gu, 04389, KR

Last Update: 05/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.lguplus.com
354/1000Critical

Simply. U+

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:2,740
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1
ZTE Corporation

ZTE Corporation

ZTE Corporation Hi-Tech Road South, Shenzhen, 518057, CN

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zte.com.cn/global
798/1000Fair

ZTE connects the world with continuous innovation for a better future. The company provides innovative technologies and integrated solutions, and its portfolio spans communication networks, computing infrastructure, industry digital solutions, and personal and home sm...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:31,346
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)

LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ZTE Corporation

ZTE Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) has 45.05% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZTE Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ZTE Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZTE Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)

LG유플러스 (LG Uplus)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SK-LG-1786027269
🔒 Incident : Breach
LG-0262902102325
🔒 Incident : Breach
LG-4862648103025
ZTE Corporation

ZTE Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) company and ZTE Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) and ZTE Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) and ZTE Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) or ZTE Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) or ZTE Corporation ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) and ZTE Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LG유플러스 (LG Uplus) and ZTE Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108680
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to send template notifications by calling POST /sys/api/sendTemplateAnnouncement. Low-privileged attackers can supply forged sender, recipients, title, and template parameters to deliver messages appearing to come from admin or system accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108679
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the sendBusAnnouncement handler of SystemApiController that allows any authenticated user to send announcements without the required permissions. Low-privileged attackers can POST crafted bodies to /sys/api/sendBusAnnouncement with forged sender, recipients, title and content to deliver spoofed admin or system messages for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108678
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryUserRoles handler of SystemApiController that lets authenticated users read any user's role codes. Low-privileged attackers can send GET requests to /sys/api/queryUserRoles with an arbitrary username to enumerate role assignments and identify administrator accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108677
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GET /sys/api/getUserByName that allows low-privileged authenticated users to retrieve any user's stored password value. Attackers can decrypt the AES-CBC protected response using the hard-coded key exposed by /sys/getEncryptedString to obtain administrators' password ciphertexts for offline guessing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108676
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysAnnouncementController downLoadFiles handler that allows low-privileged authenticated users to download announcement attachments. Attackers can supply a known announcement id to retrieve a ZIP of attachments from unreleased announcements or those addressed only to other users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8